![]() RSS/XML | |
|
By Donald Sensing
Why Blogads here work! and see here. Link Reciprocity Policy ![]()
Email is considered publishable unless you request otherwise. Sorry, I cannot promise a reply.
Blogroll:News sites:Washington TimesWashington Post National Review Drudge Report National Post Real Clear Politics NewsMax New York Times UK Times Economist Jerusalem Post The Nation (Pakistan) World Press Review Fox News CNN BBC USA Today Omaha World Herald News Is Free Rocky Mtn. News Gettys Images Iraq Today Opinions, Current Events and ReferencesOpinion Journal BlogRunner 100 The Strategy Page Reason Online City Journal Lewis & Clark links Front Page Independent Women's Forum Jewish World Review Foreign Policy in Focus Policy Review The New Criterion Joyner Library Links National Interest Middle East Media Research Institute Institute for the Secularisation of Islamic Society Sojourners Online Brethren Revival Saddam Hussein's Iraq National Coalition Against Legalized Gambling Telford Work Unbound Bible Good News Movement UM Accountability Institute for Religion and Democracy Useful Sites:Internet Movie DatabaseMapquest JunkScience.com Webster Dictionary U.S. Army Site Defense Dept. Iraq Net WMD Handbook Urban Legends (Snopes) Dan Miller Auto Consumer Guide CIA World Fact Book Blogging tools Map library Online Speech Bank Technorati (My Tech. page) Great Python Site! Shooting SportsTrapshooting Assn.Nat. Skeet Shooting Assn. Trapshooters.com Clay-Shooting.com NRA Baikal Beretta USA Browning Benelli USA Charles Daly Colt CZ USA EAA H-K; FABARM USA Fausti Stefano Franchi USA Kimber America Remington Rizzini Ruger Tristar Verona Weatherby Winchester Proud member of the Rocky Top Brigade! ![]() Blogwise Essays and columns by others of enduring interest Coffee Links How to roast your own coffee! I buy from CoffeeMaria Gillies Coffees Bald Mountain Front Porch Coffee Burman Coffee Café Maison CCM Coffee Coffee Bean Corral Coffee Bean Co. Coffee for Less Coffee Links Page Coffee Storehouse Coffee, Tea, Etc. Batian Peak Coffee & Kitchen Coffee Project HealthCrafts Coffee MollyCoffee NM Piñon Coffee Coffee is My Drug of Choice Pony Espresso Pro Coffee 7 Bridges Co-op Story House Sweet Maria’s Two Loons Kona Mountain The Coffee Web Zach and Dani’s Roast profile chart Links for me Verizon text msg HTML special codes Comcast RhymeZone Bin Laden's Strategic Plan Online Radio The Big Picture SSM essay index See my Essays Index! Web Enalysis UMC Homosexuality Links Page |
Saturday, June 28, 2003
One study by William Frey, a demographer at the Brookings Institution in Washington, predicts that the median age in the United States in 2050 will be 35.4, only a very slight increase from what it is now. In Europe, by contrast, it is expected to rise to 52.3 from 37.7.In case you haven't read WOC's post on 12 under-rated global trends, do so. One of the 12 is Europe's looming pension crisis, where we find the following tidbit from the UK Independent: The implications of ageing on the European social welfare model, where the current generation of working people pay the benefits of the current generation of retirees, have been so widely recognised that there is a danger of "pension fatigue" overtaking electorates. The core problem is that welfare systems that were developed at a time when there were more than four workers for every pensioner cannot function when there are fewer than two. (In the case of Spain and Italy, there will actually be fewer workers than pensioners when the present 20-somethings retire.)But that's not all. Not only is Europe's population aging, it is growing smaller. Either Europeans need to increase their own birth rate (perhaps, as it has increased in France recently) or they will need to increase immigration. But anti-immigrant sentiment is rising there. Governments' suggestions to raise the pension-eligibility age are strongly resisted. "In reality, a legal retirement age of 80 is what we should aim at," Erich Streissler, an Austrian economist, wrote in a newspaper article.Fat chance. In fact, more than half of men across Europe stop working between age 55-65.
Friday, June 27, 2003
The fish was unveiled in 2001, but it took another year and a half to develop a technique to render the animal sterile. It cannot cross-breed with natural fish.
We should have known that entertainment would be a leading result of DNA engineering.
God has given all those so called Muslim countries enough time to apply His book (Quran), but they deserted the Quran, denied the basic life principles to their people, took away the freedom to , think, speak, write, move, work, worship, choose their leaders, make decisions concerning their life and future ...etc , defying God's law. They established governments based on dictatorship, that gave no place to the people to express themselves or run their countries. They gave the wealth of these countries to a few and left the rest of the people starving. They put aside God's Book (Quran) and its laws and made their own man-made laws that is full of contradiction to God's system. Therefore, God is fulfilling His promise in Sura Muhammed. 47:38(Italics original) I recall that many commentators, including myself, have said since Sept. 2001 that if Islam is not a unified block of America haters, then Muslims who live here need to say so. It seems to me that Sayed Abu Mandoor, the author of this piece, is saying so quite clearly. Those of us who have asked for such renunciations are obligated to publicize them when they are made. So I do, and I thank you, Mr. Mandoor.
The historic meeting between Mr Kim and his northern counterpart, Kim Jong-il, in the North Korean capital Pyongyang in June 2000 was the crowning moment of Kim Dae-jung's presidency, with both countries pledging to end 50 years of bitterness and pursue a path to eventual reunification.As others have pointed out, when North Korea finally falls - and it will, we just don't know when - the South's graft and corruption in its dealings with the North will take our breath away. Thursday, June 26, 2003
Employees must keep the weapon concealed and employees who legally use a concealed weapon on school grounds do so in their individual capacities, not their scope of employment.
The roots of Islamic extremism lie not so much in religion but in repressive societies with economies too anemic to provide livelihoods for their fast-growing populations. Despite much talk of reform, most Arab countries remain museums of state capitalism. There's no sign of a leader who could shake things to the core. "Those who expect a new, reformed Islam are asking the wrong questions. We don't have a Luther. We don't have a Calvin," says Tahseen Bashir, a former Egyptian presidential spokesman and diplomat.Compare this pessimistic attitude of that Middle Eastern Muslim with that of the Western Muslims in the earlier post. I think it's revealing.
. . . labeled well-meaning Christians "inexcusably naive" in their dealings with their Islamic interlocutors.Even Tibi's challengers agree that Islam must become pluralistic and tolerant. It's a good article, but you will notice that none of the Muslim scholars cited live in Arab countries, though some hail from them. Hat tip: Chris Noble, who also links to the Time story on why and how Muslims are now seen by American Christian evangelicals as the mission field of choice.
Indeed, many of the achievements can be measured in the postwar potential catastrophes that were prevented. There has been no refugee crisis. There has been no humanitarian crisis. Starvation has not occurred. And a health crisis has not developed. Wednesday, June 25, 2003
But in Pakistan, many Islamic radicals hold equal (and sometimes more) animosity toward dissenting Muslims (particularly Shiites) than toward westerners. The Sipah-i-Sahaba have even killed many of their own Sunni clerics, because the clerics rejected their divisive agenda. Often, implementing a skewed understanding of Islamic sharia (religious law) -- and not hatred of the West -- is their prime motivation.Commentators have written since Sept. 11, 2001 that there is a "struggle for the soul of Islam" going on among Muslims today. Like "fundamentalism," it is really an inapt phrasing. It presumes that there is some essential Islamic definition or essence that is presently hidden somehow, and that reactionary Muslims are struggling with moderates to redefine it. Not really. The struggle, including violence, is of course real. Islam does not exists apart from its adherents, any more than Christianity exists apart from Christians. I have previously written that Islam is what Muslims do, as essay in which I carelessly mentioned the "soul" of "real" Islam. ("Soul" is a Western-Christian metaphor, not an Islamic one, and "real" Islam assumes that there is an ideal form of Islam that exists independently of Muslims. Clearly, this cannot be so. I recant.) What it really being contended is not merely whose practice of Islam will dominate, religiously speaking, but who will rule politically as the result. (Again, it is we who bifurcate religion and politics, Islam has not for most of its history.) However, this American Muslim does write about the "soul of Islam" and insists that "the Muslim world" has already lost true Muslim authenticity: First, we have to recognize that Islam in America is probably closer to the true teachings of the Prophet Muhammad, may he be blessed, than at any other time in the last five hundred years. No, I'm not saying that Muslims are better believers today. I'm saying that the access to pure Islamic teachings and the ability to live them to their fullest moral and social potential is more pronounced here, in North America, than in Iraq, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Nigeria or anywhere else. The Muslim world: forget about it. It's too bogged down in stupidity, corruption, nationalism, racism and every other kind of ailment you can imagine. The light of Islam has been put out in the Muslim world and has been reborn in the heart of the secular, faithless West. (Allah is truly great!)This is a pretty entertaining essay, especially in the analysis of the three main groups of Muslims in America, but I can't vouch for the accuracy of the writer's exposition. It is not really accurate to speak of "fundamentalist" Muslims. Fundamentalism is a term that originated in American Christianity about 90 years ago. American Christian fundamentalism sprung from sets of theological writings centered out of Princeton Theological Seminary. A reaction to theological liberalism and scientific modernity, the movement took its name from its attempts to identify the fundamentals of Christianity, meaning the faith claims and affirmations without which Christianity would lose its essential identity. However, Muslims generally object that "fundamentalist" is an inappropriate term when speaking of Islamic movements. According to Mr. Macksood Aftab, managing editor of The Islamic Herald, to apply the term "fundamentalist" to Muslims is "neither fair nor valid": Because in the case of Islam all Muslims believe in absolute inerrancy of the Quran, since it is a basic Islamic tenet. Therefore the media would have to use the word fundamentalist for all Muslims! which it does not do. It only uses the word Fundamentalist for both the extremist and terrorist groups, and the true moderate Islamic revivalist movements. Both these definitions are incompatible with each other.Mr. Aftab also points out that there are numerous Islamic revival/renewal movements, and only a small minority are violent. While I understand his objections to using "fundamentalist" to describe only certain Muslims and not others, it is the best we can do for now. So I will keep using it, always attempting to distinguish between the violent and non-violent.
The chief lobby group of the nation's major recording labels today said it would file hundreds of lawsuits against Internet users who illegally trade copyrighted music files.I am not defending copyright infringement, but these kinds of stories indicate to me that the RIAA is neither very commercially nor technologically savvy. A news report I heard this week said that there are four billion files swapped every month. I'm guessing that a few hundred lawsuits won't stem the tide. What they should do is figure how to ride the wave rather than turn back the tide. That's what Apple is doing with its iTunes service. The revolutionary iTunes Music Store puts 200,000 songs at your fingertips. It’s built right into iTunes 4 and lets you search or browse genres, new releases, exclusives and more. Preview any song for free. When you find a song you want, buy it for just 99¢.Now you may ask, "Why pay a buck per tune at iTunes when you can download tunes free from Kazaa?" - or another P2P service? One reason is that iTunes lets you preview a tune before you d/l it, so you don't waste time trying downloading a tune of which you are uncertain of the name, but will recognize the music. Another reason is that P2P services are rife with incomplete files in which the song cuts off in the middle. A third reason is that with iTunes, what you download is what you get. Some P2P users are known to take their porn files and give them the names of in-demand music, just for kicks. Apple expects the cost per song to fall, perhaps as much as by half, in the reasonably near future. Unfortunately, iTunes is available now only for Mac users, so Apple is guilty of business short-sightedness, too. NPR did a very good segment on iTunes and online music-file downloading yesterday.
somebody whose worldview is “naturalistic” -- “free of supernatural and mystical elements.” In other words, I do not believe in Santa Claus or the tooth fairy, nor do I believe “on faith” that there’s some big guy in the sky who’s about to squash me under his big thumb for crossing against the light.Funny, I don't believe that either. I guess the standard of "brightness" is pretty low. So here we have a woman who claims to be free of all that religion stuff, but who calls herself a "goddess." Okaaay . . . . 'Scuse me while I just laugh my head off. But this woman really, really hates religion and holds in contempt anyone whose religion doesn't agree with hers - which is everyone religious, of course, because no one will worship at the temple of Amy as much or as well as Amy will. The worst god of all is Ego. Monday, June 23, 2003
The Americans for Gun Safety Foundation positions itself in the middle of the United States' long-running debate over guns. While it promotes strong support for the right to bear arms, it advocates equally strong enforcement of the gun laws on the books.Well, here is AGS' Home Page, and they frankly don't seem very moderate to me, especially since they repeat the lie about the non-existent "gun show loophole." ! don't see any evidence at all that AGS "promotes strong support for the right to bear arms." But their web site claims they are moderate, so that's good enough for a writer at the Tennessean, I guess. I am less than surprised. Dave Kopel has some other facts about AGS. Also, the Pennsylvania State Police debunks AGS's claim that state-run background checks of gun purchasers are poor; the state police calls AGS's research "shoddy."
With respect to Iran, it appears that all we really need to do is get rid of a relatively small number of mullahs and Iran will fall to some sort of democratic style of government, especially with the uprisings currently underway. But aren't those mullahs rather public people compared to say, Saddam with his doubles and ever changing locales? Couldn't we hit them with one cruise missile and effectively change the government overnight? Sure, we'd take some flack for this "unprovoked" attack, but if we got most of the mullahs with one shot wouldn't the uprising succeed without further intervention on our part?We are not at war in law or in fact with Iran. Before the Iraq campaign began, we had been at war with Iraq in fact since 1991, and in law since last October, when the Congress declared war against Iraq. (President Clinton, though, stoutly maintained throughout his presidency that the congressional war authorization of 1991 never ended, and attacked Iraq several times using the 1991 resolution as authoritative.) And there is no casus belli with Iran, either now or in the offing that would lead to congressional authorization for military strikes, however limited, against the country. Absent such authorization, Furthermore, and just as important, the people of Iran seem presently pro-American (I would emphasize the word, "seem.") We should support them in more than symbolic ways. But the best way to turn them against us would be to strike militarily at their country in the manner suggested. Jeff Jarvis has done a lot of blogging about Iran, potential courses of action, and especially keeping touch with Iranian bloggers (there are more than a few). This pretty much sums it up: . . . the theme of every Iranian weblog I have read and it can all be summarized in three little words: Do not invade. . . . In Iran, we are clearly better off if democracy is a domestic product and if we are able to provide appropriate support.I think that Iranian pro-Americanism is at bottom really more anti-ayatollahism than actual pro-Americanism. Proclaiming admiration for America is a good way of letting the ayatollahs know how much they hate them. Remember, it was Ayatollah Khomeini who made a career, practically, out of calling America the Great Satan. Khomeini's successors have hardly softened the rhetoric. There is also much more of a targeting problem than my correspondent seems to think. The chances of all the key leaders being in one place at the same time, plus the likelihood we would know about it far enough in advance to program a cruise missile or three, plus the likelihood that they leaders would stay put long enough to be hit - all add up to a very remote chance, IMO. Not only that, the sudden evaporation of national control would not necessarily be a good thing. There is no group actually prepared to take the reins of government, at least not yet. And not all anti-cleric groups are pro-democracy, and not all get along with one another. So chaos in Iran would serve no one's interests, including our own. When the ayatollahs are toppled, it is critical for America's interests that Iran's weapons stay under control and not come into the possession of terrorists. In addition to potential WMDs (say, atomic material for a dirty bomb), terrorists would be thrilled to get hold of explosives and modern arms such as shoulder-fired anti-aircraft missiles, or get more of them. I have written before that Britain is critical to dealing with Iran. Not long ago Steven Den Beste emailed me the link to a Telegraph article that says so, too. The Brits have better, deeper contacts in Iran than we do.
Sunday, June 22, 2003
Saturday, June 21, 2003
Friday, June 20, 2003
We are going to be in Iraq for a long time. It's a worthwhile mission, on many counts, but it won't be a short one or a small one. And long after Rumsfeld's K-Mart commissars have moved on to cushy private-sector jobs, Sgt. Jones, faced with his fourth unaccompanied tour in Baghdad and his second divorce, is going to call it quits.General Edward C. Meyer, Army chief of staff in the early 1980s, pointed out, "The Army enlists soldiers but reenlists spouses." He meant that unless wives (and nowadays, husbands) of the troops are happy with their spouse's chosen career, the career won't last long. And Meyer was the chief well before the percentage of married soldiers rocketed upward. Last I checked, almost 60 percent of the Army's enlisted members are married. The percentage of married officers is very high, more than 80 percent as I recall. Obviously, it is the lower ranking enlisted troops and officers who tend to be single. Mid-grade and higher NCOs and officers have a much higher married percentage. This is the chink in the argument that Trent Telenko makes about restoring the draft as a way of furnishing a constabulary in Iraq. Says Trent: If we must deploy large numbers of American occupation troops anyway, which can't be our existing, expensive and limited ground combat specialists who are needed for further operations, we must create a new force structure as cheaply as possible -- AKA draftees -- to provide the staying power we need for long-term nation building.That may be fine for junior enlisted troops (privates through specialists, E1-E4) whom we could send on a two-year tour to Iraq, after which they would come home and be discharged. But the critical ranks are the staff sergeants and higher. They can't be drafted, they have to be grown from below. And, as Peters points out, they will leave the Army in droves if they foresee nothing but deployments and family separations for years to come. So will mid-grade officers. This is a serious problem. The main key to the success of American forces has been the seasoned professionalism of its troops, especially the NCOs. I wrote in more detail about this aspect here. We won't have competent privates without thoroughly professional NCOs, and we won't have the NCOs without personnel stability and high reenlistment rates. "Shake and bake" schools, as they were called in the Vietnam War, can churn out large numbers of NCOs with little time in service, but they can't teach maturity or experience. Those come only with the passage of time and a variety of experiences. The only way to alleviate the problem is to grow the force structure in whole units, reducing the amount ratio of deployment time to at-home time each unit has. This doesn't mean that we should add combat divisions. We need more support units, especially military police, civil affairs and engineers. These can't be grown quickly with an all-volunteer system, it's true. But we need to start quickly. Otherwise our combat troops will wind up doing catch-all jobs for which they are nor trained or equipped, and the next time we need them to fight the results could be bad. Related posts: I said at the end of a post before the Iraq campaign started that "the peace to follow will probably be a mess." If the situation in Iraq seems messy, Phil Carter explains why: we war-gamed the war, but not the peace. However, the American administrator in Iraq, L. Paul Bremer, writes today that progress is being made, there is a plan, and much work is yet to be done. Meanwhile, "Two top U.S. defense officials signaled Congress yesterday that U.S. forces might remain in Iraq for as long as a decade and that permanent facilities need to be built to house them there."
WINNING NOTICE FOR CATEGORY B WINNER: KP6821873DLThis is just as authentic as the Nigerian oil minister's widow's email, of course. The genuine UK lottery is warning people that it is a scam. Of course, all lotteries are scams.
U.S. military sources say she is unable -- or unwilling -- to say much about anything that happened to her between the morning her Army unit was ambushed and when she became fully conscious sometime later at Saddam Hussein General Hospital in Nasiriyah, Iraq.As you may remember, initial accounts of Lynch's actions said that she had fought like an Amazon, shooting all her ammo and killing a number of Iraqi soldiers, being wounded herself. How could anyone not remember that? Now it turns out that her injuries - very severe ones - resulted from a "catastrophic" collision of her Humvee into a wrecked truck after the Humvee was struck by an RPG. A U.S. tractor-trailer with a flatbed swerved around an Iraqi dump truck and jackknifed. As Dowdy's speeding Humvee approached the overturned tractor-trailer, it was hit on the driver's side by a rocket-propelled grenade. The driver, [Pfc. Lori] Piestewa, lost control of the Humvee, swerved right and struck the trailer.Now her loss of memory seems entirely credible to me. In March 1998 I was injured in a near-catastrophic collision of my own: I was driving my 1995 VW Jetta to class. It was raining and I took a shortcut down a farm road. I did not know that the road had been somehow impregnated with agricultural chemicals that rain made about as slick as Teflon. (This is what a county deputy sheriff told me later.) I rounded a gentle curve at 30 mph. The car fishtailed violently. I reverse steered energetically to no avail. In two eyeblinks it was obvious that I was in the arms of Isaac Newton. I remember saying, "Well, I'm really screwed now." That's the last thing I remember between that moment and between 15-20 minutes later when I opened my eyes and saw the bent-double dashboard and heard an ambulance crew trying to get inside the car. My injuries were not as severe as Lynch's - my left arm was shattered, my legs were crushed and the left side of my head was cut up by flying glass, but that's all. A surgeon repaired my arm with steel and screws, my head repaired itself (some would argue not!) and my legs recovered after about 18 months. I took physical therapy for some weeks afterward. The road, btw, continued to claim other victims, including one of my professors, whose van was totaled but she was uninjured. Three years later I went to assist at another wreck at almost the identical place mine had been in my capacity as a volunteer sheriff's dept. chaplain. A Volvo has spun out in the rain, being driven by the adult daughter of a county official. She was uninjured, but her 16-year-old brother, sitting unbuckled in the right-front seat, was covered in blood from head to knees. Two other, younger siblings in the back seat suffered internal injuries. None died, but two of them were badly hurt. Within two months the county tore the road up down to the dirt and rebuilt it. Amazing that several years of regular wrecks along that stretch, including some fatalities, drew no official attention, but one wreck by a county official's family got action. Thursday, June 19, 2003
Wednesday, June 18, 2003
|