One Hand Clapping
RSS/XML | Add to My Yahoo!| Essays | Disclaimer | Main Page | My Bio | | Archives | Backup Site

Friday, September 19, 2003


The Saddam - bin Laden connection
I have been blogging a lot about Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda lately. In case you missed it, my posts are:

  • Osama bin Laden’s strategic plan - well, folks, he ain’t got one
  • Al Qaeda fighters in Iraq
  • Why does al Qaeda fight Americans in Iraq?

    Comes now Darren Kaplan who writes that the connection between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda is irrefutable.
    Abu Sayyaf is a terrorist group that has operated in the southern Philippines since the 1990s. Abu Sayyaf has been linked to kidnappings, bombings and assassinations. One of Abu Sayyaf's stated goals is winning the release of Ramzi Yousef, an affiliate member of Abu Sayyaf who was convicted of being the mastermind of the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. (There is some circumstantial evidence that Ramzi Yousef is himself, actually an Iraqi intelligence agent, but I do not find the evidence adduced thus far convincing.)
    USA Today reports that a perpetrator of the 1993 attack at large, Abdul Rahman Yasin, was given shelter and money by the Iraqi government. Documents captured recently in Iraq "show that Saddam's government provided monthly payments and a home for Yasin." But the connection between Yasin and Saddam’s regime is still considered tentative; the documents were captured so recently that they are still being catalogued.

    Kaplan continues,
    It is uncontested that Abu Sayyaf is a close al Qaeda affiliate if not an actual member of the larger al Qaeda organization. . . .
    Darren quotes a 2001 ABC News story that said,
    Like al Qaeda, Abu Sayyaf has its roots in the 1980s war to drive the Soviet Union from Afghanistan. Several future members of both groups--including bin Laden and future Abu Sayyaf leader Abdurajak Abubakar Janjalani--fought with Muslim mujahideen forces. Soon after the war, the nascent Abu Sayyaf offered training in combat and terrorist skills at a "university" in Pakistan.
    The Philippine government expelled an Iraqi diplomat this year because of his contacts with Abu Sayyaf. Furthermore, a key Abu Sayyaf leader told Filipino media that he had collected cash from Iraqi diplomats "several times, to finance violent acts."

    Darren concludes, "Given all that we know to date, Abu Sayyaf is an irrefutable terrorist link between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda." (Hat tip: Bill Hobbs)

    But there’s more. Stephen Hayes of The Weekly Standard reports,
    The CIA has confirmed, in interviews with detainees and informants it finds highly credible, that al Qaeda's Number 2, Ayman al-Zawahiri, met with Iraqi intelligence in Baghdad in 1992 and 1998. More disturbing, according to an administration official familiar with briefings the CIA has given President Bush, the Agency has "irrefutable evidence" that the Iraqi regime paid Zawahiri $300,000 in 1998, around the time his Islamic Jihad was merging with al Qaeda. "It's a lock," says this source. Other administration officials are a bit more circumspect, noting that the intelligence may have come from a single source. Still, four sources spread across the national security hierarchy have confirmed the payment.

    In interviews conducted over the past six weeks with uniformed officers on the ground in Iraq, intelligence officials, and senior security strategists, several things became clear. Contrary to the claims of its critics, the Bush administration has consistently underplayed the connections between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda. Evidence of these links existed before the war.
    (Hat tip: Ed) The rest of the article is long and detailed. It’s worth noting that while Osama bin Laden opposed Saddam’s Baathist rule because it was not Islamic (bin Laden called it "socialist"), bin Laden has for many years railed against America for causing the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi children through the UN sanctions imposed after the Gulf War. (The fact that Iraqi doctors have since laid the blame on Saddam’s regime no doubt does not impress Osama bin Laden.)

    Osama bin Laden issued a fatwa (a religious ruling) in 1998 called Jihad Against Jews and Crusaders. In it, he repeats his longstanding claim that the Americans are occupiers and pillagers of the Arabian Peninsula.
    The best proof of this is the Americans' continuing aggression against the Iraqi people using the Peninsula as a staging post, even though all its rulers are against their territories being used to that end, but they are helpless.

    Second, despite the great devastation inflicted on the Iraqi people by the crusader-Zionist alliance, and despite the huge number of those killed, which has exceeded 1 million... despite all this, the Americans are once again trying to repeat the horrific massacres . . .

    So here they come to annihilate what is left of this people and to humiliate their Muslim neighbors.

    Third, if the Americans' aims behind these wars are religious and economic, the aim is also to serve the Jews' petty state and divert attention from its occupation of Jerusalem and murder of Muslims there. The best proof of this is their eagerness to destroy Iraq, the strongest neighboring Arab state . . . .
    The fatwa then calls upon all Muslims everywhere, "to kill the Americans and plunder their money wherever and whenever they find" them. Osama bin Laden has styled himself as a champion of the Iraqi people for at least seven years, as he also railed against Iraqi children's suffering in his 1996 fatwa. That fact, coupled with his declaration that an alliance with the "socialists" (Saddam’s regime) was permissible, pretty much cuts the rug out from those who claim that bin Laden would never make common cause with Iraq. As the old saying goes, "the enemy of my enemy is my friend," and any Muslims - even so nominal a one as Saddam Hussein - who opposed America could be a friend of Osama bin Laden.

    by Donald Sensing, 9/19/2003 06:56:34 AM. Permalink |  





  • Feedburner RSS/XML readers online:


    Home